Numerous users increased question at the method in which the latest panel conference find got on the meeting where the permanent appointment out of Mr Hlaudi Motsoeneng given that COO occurred. Ms Geldenhuys is questioned to the whether or not she ever before advised the panel about what courtroom repercussions of their measures during conferences. Ms Geldenhuys get declare that she was bullied at the meetings but she still got email address on this lady fingertips whereby she you can expect to features advised the fresh new board, regardless of if it had been following the facts. Though she conceded to help you being aware that the procedure of appointment of Mr Motsoeneng on account of a page off his attorneys is actually procedurally completely wrong, she failed to provide advice into panel however, declined that she had complete anything wrong because the she had not took part in flouting policies. Ms Geldenhuys, even if saying she had been bullied, rejected that Mr Motsoeneng bullied this lady, alleging it absolutely was low-exec panel participants, such as Mr Krish Naidoo and Mr Nomvuyo Mhlakaza, that has bullied their.
He was asked in the event the the guy considered the money invested by the SABC becoming from the personal bag; in the event that he guided elderly managers to trust which they do not account to the people away from SA; and you will about his connection with Mr Motsoeneng
She answered that the Minister got requested a summary of brand new behavior off board members hence she got said on the lack of attendance and you can lack of collaboration amongst board participants, but it was never ever an investigation. This new Chairperson was unimpressed, and you may reminded Ms Geldenhuys you to definitely she are significantly less than oath and you may accountable into the Panel with regards to the Enterprises Work, rather than the fresh Minister. Ms Geldenhuys conceded one to she are one hundred% browbeaten of the previous SABC Board chairperson, Ms Ellen Tshabalala. MPs asked which faction of the panel Ms Geldenhuys belonged to, to which she responded that she try an independent person.
The new Chairperson reprimanded the fresh new SABC from the its highest delegation stating that the fresh Panel never wanted to look for it takes place once again into the taxpayers’ currency and categorized it fruitless and you may wasteful expenditure.
The newest SABC panel chairperson, Prof Mbulaheni Maguvhe, appeared and you can are questioned with the his attempts to prevent or delay new parliamentary inquiry between his interdict software, the fresh refusal to incorporate files, with his stroll-out of the eight December conference. He was expected who the guy think are financing his courtroom will cost you and that has generated choice to talk outside lawyers to act on behalf of the newest board if board didn’t have good quorum so you can effect eg a choice. He had been asked about the fresh flouting of your own ICASA governing towards the latest SABC protest plan, the fresh new low-quorate meeting regarding Ms Bessie Tugwana just like the pretending COO; whether or not the guy chosen towards the conference regarding Mr Motsoeneng just like the permanent COO; on ignoring this new corrective step of your own Public Protector and disregarding colleagues’ warnings against the contravening off rules and you will on blurring the newest outlines involving the manager in addition to panel. He had been informed the witnesses before Committee reported one they had come disappointed by the SABC, the fresh new Minister while the Board, much of whom was indeed discharged, others of exactly who was basically frozen unlawfully. He had been inquired about procurement put into both hands from Mr Motsoeneng, resulting in R100 million becoming spent in place of after the correct procurement process.
Fulfilling statement
Prof Bongani Khumalo: former SABC Panel associate This new Chairperson launched that the first witness is Prof Bongani Khumalo, former SABC Panel user. He informed Prof Khumalo that he’s required by rules to answer the questions legitimately lay to your completely and satisfactorily. Likewise, he is expected to produce people expected documents concerning the topic matter of the newest inquiry, despite the fact the clear answer otherwise document you will incriminate him otherwise expose your so you can criminal otherwise civil proceedings or damage.